Opinion

The Burning Question: Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

With the highest score in the Fantasy Premier League last season, Eden Hazard is hot property heading into the 2015/16 campaign. At the time of writing, the Chelsea winger is far and away the most popular player in the game and is owned by an astonishing 56.9% of Fantasy managers. While the majority clearly see him as a must-have, could Hazard’s hefty £11.5m price tag be better used elsewhere? With this in mind we ask the Burning Question: Is Eden Hazard Really ‘Essential’?

Applebonkers says…
Tantalisingly for Chelsea fans, Hazard should still be on an upward curve in his career. With the same manager in place and same team-mates around him, you’d therefore estimate at least a similar sort of output this time round.

It would have taken a price tag north of 12m to start window shopping elsewhere. Assuming Diego Costa passes the penalty baton back to Hazard after their Gameweek 38 shenanigans last season, then he remains the only big hitter in midfield with that trump card in his locker.

Essential is a word I prefer to avoid, but in a game of so many unknowns there is a comforting feeling of predictability about the Belgian.

Simon March (2014/15’s Fantasy Premier League winner) says…
“Essential” is a bit of a derided term around these parts but I do believe there are particular players that, in certain circumstances, it may too dangerous to go without. Right now, for me, Eden Hazard, falls firmly within that category.

Even if we look past the fact that he averages over 200 points a season, that he was the top FPL point scorer last season or that he is the standout performer among the reigning Premier League champions, it’s impossible to ignore his ownership percentage. At the moment, Hazard sits in over 56% of squads and he will also be a popular captaincy choice. This means that, while his ownership remains so high, the matter of whether he performs well or not will, each week, be a hugely influential factor, potentially the most decisive factor, on rankings throughout the game. I’m not sure I’d want to bet weekly against a player of that quality at those stakes.

Eventually, a broader range of high-scoring players will emerge and Hazard’s ownership figures will start to be dispersed among those alternatives. Other options will become more viable. Until then, however, the cost of owning Hazard may well be the cost of keeping up with the competition.

Jonty says…
I said Angel Di Maria was essential last year and look where that got me. If any player is to take the mantle in 2015/16 it is Hazard. The Belgian’s huge ownership means that if he scores a penalty and gains bonus points in Gameweek 1, non-owners face a potentially disappointing start to the season.

His track record is also impressive. Last year he racked up 233 points and part of his appeal was an ability to gain FPL bonus points from just an assist, goal or even his general passing play. This season, I think he can easily gain a similar total points haul, but he may struggle to match his bonus tally of 42, with passing prowess given less prominence in 2015/16’s bonus allocation.

This year his price also has to be taken into account. Last term he finished on 10.8m, which was remarkable value for his points return. He now starts at 0.7 more, while team-mates Cesc Fabregas, Diego Costa and midfield rivals like Theo Walcott are less. Can he offer the same bang for his buck at a new inflated price? This year I think there may be better value heavy hitters in the 8m to 10.5m category.

There is also Chelsea’s poor set of fixtures early on, with West Brom and Manchester City amongst their opening trio of opponents. Over the season I have no doubt Hazard will be amongst the top scorers but arguably he won’t over the first three Gameweeks.

I’ve tried drafting teams with or without him. The ones without all look better, with Fabregas allowing a whopping 2.5m to be spent elsewhere. But then I look at Hazard’s ownership, his track record and his strong performances in pre-season and that word ‘essential’ comes back into my thoughts again.

D1sable says…
Season long I’m going to have to say ‘yes’ with the current information we have. Of course Fantasy Football can spring surprises and I have learnt not to completely write off anyone, so while I’m open to changing that view, as it stands, he offers, at least for my mind, the best route into the probable League champion’s attack.

He’s still young at 24 and I can only see progression in his ability and performances. He’s 100% nailed on, started all 38 matches last season, he’s on penalties, and rarely succumbs to injury. He also loves bonus points (although with the new system perhaps slightly less), which makes him a great Captain choice.

Having said all that I’m not starting with him. His fixtures and early season form in the past have made me look elsewhere (perhaps naively) but this is mainly due to me planning an early wildcard. Would I advise anyone to follow suit who wasn’t planning on hitting the button? Absolutely not.

Evs says…
Do we have anyone else in his mold, with the exception of Sergio Aguero? Arguably not.

We no longer have a Gareth Bale, Frank Lampard or Steven Gerrard, who in their prime ripped up midfield scoring charts. The only competitor I see to him in FPL points scoring is Alexis Sanchez, who seems to share points amongst other Arsenal attacking colleagues.

Last year I went for Cesc Fabregas over Hazard to save a couple of quid. This worked out well over the first few months as both players went toe-to-toe on points. The cheaper Fabregas’ price rose, I refused to sell him and by Christmas I was left behind and was chasing the pack without Hazard, who by then had become a points juggernaut.

So for me, once bitten twice shy. Hazard is the prime midfield option and is the first name on my team sheet.

Ryan says…
No player is essential. The elite options have been priced accordingly and thus we cannot have all of them. With a budget of 100m, sacrifices will need to be made so a team cannot include all of Sergio Aguero, Eden Hazard and Alexis Sanchez plus a multitude of 8.5 – 10m options. With so much value in Arsenal’s attack, Sanchez could be dropped from that list, leaving Aguero and Hazard as two who might be considered ‘essential’. Even then, though, having both would use nearly a quarter of the budget and that will have serious implications on the rest of your team.

Going without Aguero early on might help matters but once he returns and starts a good run of fixtures in Gameweek 4 you’ll want to get him in. As a way of releasing funds, Hazard owners will be tempted to sell and it begs the question- why would you want Hazard for his first three matches, that include a visit to Manchester City and West Brom. Perhaps less funds spent on Chelsea assets might not be a bad idea to start off with.

Mark says…
Hazard is scaring the pants off me: I can’t remember going into Gameweek 1 facing a decision which I felt could genuinely make or break my season.

I’ve got nagging reservations about Chelsea over their opening fixtures and there’s no doubt that the funds liberated by omitting the Belgian can transform my squad in key areas.

While Hazard has, at times, looked effective in pre-season, Chelsea have appeared to be predictable and over reliant on his ability to break open opponents. For me, it stands to reason that Swansea will devise tactics to shutdown this avenue of attack and go all out to block supply and impede Hazard’s progress – by fair means or foul. They witnessed Arsenal’s stubborn resistance at Wembley and Garry Monk will take heart and notes from that.

Following that tricky Gameweek 1 match-up, Hazard and Chelsea go to the Etihad in a scenario that will likely see Jose Mourinho show his traditional brand of bus-based caution in a bid to smash and grab the points. Then it’s off to the Hawthorns, with Tony Pulis set to make shackling Hazard the number one priority. Everton and Arsenal follow on in the next three. In short, it’s a hugely testing start for Mourinho’s side.

That all adds up to stuttering beginnings for last season’s top Fantasy asset and, potentially, with Alexis Sanchez and Sergio Aguero active and in demand, we may even start to see Hazard’s huge ownership begin to decline, along with his price.

This all sounds convincing but the flipside is that Hazard will likely end the season as the top scoring player across the Fantasy games. Mourinho will surely find a way of protecting him, granting him space and ensuring he’s the major influence. However, given their early opponents, I’m not sure how quickly that will come together. Until then, I’m wavering.

Is Hazard essential? He is to Chelsea’s title hopes. Right this minute, he’s not to my initial Fantasy lineup.

Like I say, I may have just broken my season already.

J0E Podcaster and writer. Tweets stats and stuff via @FFScout_Joe Follow them on Twitter

4,587 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Anjar
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Pelle or Mane?

    a. Pelle + Sterling

    b. Mane + Benteke

    1. FantaCity
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      b for me

    2. Albert Cole
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      b.

    3. S.Kuqi
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      A.

      Sterling is better pick than Mane and Tekkers & Pelle could go either way.

      1. _nod
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        This

      2. OzilFozzil
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Yes this

    4. Ready Manager One
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      B

    5. Splatter\\\'s Omerta
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      B

    6. timski8000
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      I like all as FPL options to be honest.

      If I had to pick, I'd go B because I think those Liverpool opening home fixtures could be juicy. Benteke could be a lovely captain pick if he starts by then.

    7. eppaligy
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      B - Mane + Benteke.

      Pelle finished last season ice cold (although has picked up in pre-season; but I don't reckon that means that much) and Sterling could be a massive expensive flop. He has no penalty, corner or set piece duties.

      Mane could break out. Benteke is exactly what 'Pool needs and I think looks red hot.

      Defos B.

      But that could be terrible advice and I'm not that good at Fantasy!!!

  2. arsenal10
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    RMT:

    ╔--------------- Ruddy ----------------------- ╗
    ----------Mert ◯ Cedric ◯ Azpi ----------
    -Hazard ◯ Walcott ◯ Ozil ◯ Sterling--
    ╚------ Pelle ◯ Rooney ◯ Deeney----- ╝

    ◯ Rudd ◯ Huth ◯ Fletcher ◯Saylor

    1. Robe Wan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      very good

    2. King Kohli
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Not worried about Giroud starting instead of Walcott?

    3. Joey Barton and Friends
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      I have 13 of those players

  3. FantaCity
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Ibe + Ighalo (punty) or Fletcher + Deeney (Dullard) ???

    1. arsenal10
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Second option

  4. Eric Banternaaa
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Anybody got the link for the Telegraph Fantasy post please?

  5. anakta
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    RMT please
    Cech (Guzan)
    Kolarov,Bellerin,Jagielka,(Oshea,Taggart)
    Hazzard,Matic,Sterling,Ox-Cham (Wanyama)
    Rooney,Aquero,Wilson

    1. Ryssel
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      I'm not convinced.....

      - Jagielka has pretty bad fixtures and it seems unlikely that he will score as much as last season. (what was it... something like 4 goals from only 15 shots?)
      - O'shea and Bellerin is not nailed on (strong competition from Coates/Kaboul and Debuchy)
      - Targett will lose his place in the team the moment Bertrand comes back which will mean a price drop so then you are stuck with a 3.9 priced defender who doesn't play which is really difficult to get rid off. Best advice... get starting defenders who cost minimum 4.5
      - Matic is a defensive mid so he probably won't score goals plus he is taking up a chelsea spot that you might want to use later.
      - The Ox is not nailed on and Arsenal has other mids that, while more expensive, will deliver much more consistant returns throughout the season.
      - Wanyama's price will probably start dropping in a few GW's as people sell him on which will put you in a postion where you have a 4.4 or 4.3 priced mid that could be difficult to swap out. He will play most games this season though so unless you plan on getting other Soton players and he is purely there as an enabler then I guess that is not a major problem.

      1. Adams6
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        And Kolarov will/could rotate with Clichy.
        Could end up with only one starting defenders, Ox not starting and Matic not scoring any points.
        Need to start again really, good advice above.

  6. S.Kuqi
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Does my defence justify having this awesome front7? 🙂

    Norwich

    Cedric-Merte-Huth-Coates-Oxford

    Hazard-Walcott-Sterling-Chadli-Westwood

    Rooney-Benteke-Pelle

    1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      No.

      1. S.Kuqi
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        😀 Whats wrong with it?

        1. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 14 Years
          8 years, 10 months ago

          Sterling Walcott and Westwood

          And FAR too much spent on the forwards.

          1. Ryssel
            • 10 Years
            8 years, 10 months ago

            Hi Doosra

            I've got the same forwards and think they are a great bet to start the season with... also allows for an easy swap of either Benteke/Pelle to Sakho/Wilson/Deeney and then Rooney to Augero so you get the great Augero fixtures and the horrible Rooney run of (Swan,Liv,Soton, Sun, Ars, Eve, Man City, Cry)....

    2. Albert Cole
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Yes, easily. Looking at the same strategy myself.

      1. Heytch
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        I'm a fan of 2 set and forget defenders so not for me. If you turn one of your 8 strikers into a 5.5-6.5 range guy you can easily have the same

        JRod will potentially emerge for early wildcard and allow you 1m from Pelle to him

    3. the cromulent one
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Not quite.
      If you want to go that cheap, then you need all 5 defenders to start. Oxford is not a starter, and there is no long-term concensus on Coates.

    4. Home Run Baker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      The problem with this approach is that the greatest bang for each £ spent is in DEF, followed by MID. The top DEFs at 7m are only 2.5 more than the cheapest starting DEFs and will likely return 160 FPL points. You have to go to 8-9m in MID or 10+ in FWDs to get that kind of payback.

  7. Sooda
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Max Gradel is unlikely to go straight into the starting XI, but could be a cracking FF player

  8. Doosra - ☭DeclanMyGenius…
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Where has the pre-Season tab gone? 😕

    1. Crinix
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      A little sooner than expected

    2. meerlight
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Couldn't get in due to the tube strike

  9. Albert Cole
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Alderweireld or Bacuna?

    1. jernej93
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Spurs has bigger clean sheet potential but Bacuna will probably play in midfield and has penalties and set pieces 🙂

      It has to be Bacuna

      1. Camp No No
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Plus, that Spurs CS potential is nothing to shout about either.

      2. eppaligy
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Terrifying when you can use the phrase "Spurs has a bigger clean sheet potential"!!! 🙂

  10. n0cturn
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Help Me:

    A. Fabregas - Chadli - Kane
    B. Hazard - Ozil - Wilson

    Your opinions needed 🙂

    1. sleecc
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      B, don't like double Spurs.

    2. Roger's Canaries
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      B

    3. OzilFozzil
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      B as well, love seems to have been lost for spurs in these here parts....

  11. anakta
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    What do you guys think??

    Cech (Guzan)
    Kolarov,Bellerin,Jagielka,(Oshea,Taggart)
    Hazzard,Matic,Sterling,Ox-Cham (Wanyama)
    Rooney,Aquero,Wilson

    1. NunchiTom
      • 8 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Not sure about Kolarov.
      Bellerin may get rotated.
      Planning to sit Aguero out at the beginning?

      1. anakta
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Thanks for the input

    2. OzilFozzil
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Kolarov, Matic, Aguero concerns...

  12. TATTOOED_2
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    a) Cazorla and Defoe

    b) Walcott and Wilson

    What do you reckon?

    1. GrumblyBlowfish
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      I like the Defoe pick. Think he could have a good season. Although I refuse to have Sunderland players in my team...

    2. invertebrate
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Why not Walcott and Defoe?

    3. TATTOOED_2
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Could go Walcott and Defoe. Originally I had Ozil but I keep changing my mind between the 3

  13. GrumblyBlowfish
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    How sure are we that Targett will start? Any chance that Martina will start instead?

    1. The Train Driver
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Has Martina got any minutes at all yet?

      1. GrumblyBlowfish
        • 10 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        I've got no idea that's why I'm asking. I just knew that they'd signed another full back a while ago

  14. QPR expects... glory!
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Press conferences for today (courtesy of the BBC)

    09:00 BST

    Everton news conference
    Watford news conference

    13:00 BST

    Bournemouth news conference
    Crystal Palace news conference

    14:00 BST

    Newcastle news conference
    Swansea news conference

    Think there may be some others scheduled for later in the afternoon but they aren't listed yet

  15. timski8000
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    I like all as FPL options to be honest.

    If I had to pick, I'd go B because I think those Liverpool opening home fixtures could be juicy. Benteke could be a lovely captain pick if he starts.

    1. timski8000
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Reply fail to Anjar - will repost. Apologies.

  16. King Kohli
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Help me out

    A) Kane + Sakho
    B) Pelle + Lukaku
    C) Any other combinations for 16m

    Haz Sterling Caz Mane
    Rooney ___ ___

    1. GrumblyBlowfish
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Kane + Mitrovic

  17. anakta
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    No guarantees but needed a 4mil def who might start. He in reserves for gameweek one and if Aguero doesn't start I will upgrade Taggart

  18. Coaly
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Considering I will want Aguero as soon as he is fit (probably for gw2), which plan is better?

    a) Fabianski 4.0, Kosc, Mane - 2.5 itb for Roo to Kun
    b) Ruddy Rudd, Bellerin, Hendo - 4.5 itb for Benteke to Kun

    1. anakta
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      I don't like itb I would use it and make the change when needed ever at the expense of a trade you could make a lot more than that with the money on the field.

      1. Coaly
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        With a I'd only to Fab to Haz and that would be the 2.5, would rather save it for one week knowing I will get Kun the following week

      2. Dre
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Disagree with not having money ITB, gives you flexibility and means that when the inevitable happens and you have to make a transfers that isn't planned, it doesn't mess with your Aguero strategy.

        I would say that 4.5 ITB is a bit excessive though, so A.

  19. Skipdipper
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Morning all... How does this look for gw1...

    Schmeichel
    Cedric Kos
    Mahrez haz (c) Ramsey Milner sterling
    Rooney pelle Wilson

    Schwarzer Coates Gomez richards
    AOA chip activated

    1. Test Eagles
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Please don't use the chips first up! Patience, my young Padiwan!

      1. Skipdipper
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Oh, why not?

        1. Jam0sh
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 10 months ago

          Let's just say we'd like to avoid any Imperial entanglements.

          1. Test Eagles
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            8 years, 10 months ago

            Bwahahaha ... perfect reply!

          2. Skipdipper
            • 12 Years
            8 years, 10 months ago

            Wreckless chip playing leads to the dark side?

            1. Test Eagles
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 12 Years
              8 years, 10 months ago

              Inadvertently, yes. The use of such chip will cause great fear.

              Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.

              1. Test Eagles
                • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                • 12 Years
                8 years, 10 months ago

                And suffering leads to ... WILDCARDS!

                1. Camp No No
                  • 10 Years
                  8 years, 10 months ago

                  And using your wildcard early on leads to taking hits!

                  1. Skipdipper
                    • 12 Years
                    8 years, 10 months ago

                    Crikey who knew just clicking on one little button could lead to all this!

                    1. Test Eagles
                      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
                      • 12 Years
                      8 years, 10 months ago

                      It's what we do best 😉

                      See reply below Skip

          3. Skipdipper
            • 12 Years
            8 years, 10 months ago

            No good as a team then?

    2. _nod
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      And the plan for gw2?

      1. Skipdipper
        • 12 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Same but three defenders... Rotate mahrez and Wilson

        1. Skipdipper
          • 12 Years
          8 years, 10 months ago

          No good then?

          1. Test Eagles
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 12 Years
            8 years, 10 months ago

            It's not bad ... I just think that the AOA chip could be more smartly used later in the season when your hand is forced to make hits.

    3. Birdman77
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Surely you wait for the likes of Aguero, Costa, Haz, etc to be fit and firing and have a reasonable GW for AOA, esp wait until you get an idea of form.

    4. Camp No No
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      It's a decent team, anyway.

    5. Skipdipper
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Thanks for comments all. Pondering now mahrez or Wilson...

  20. Test Eagles
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Righto ... I'm out ... too many A vs B ... and will be until deadline day!

    All the best kids, see you on the airwaves in the DZ for a breather!

  21. Barryyuen
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Schemeichel - Hennessey
    Mert - Cedric - Coates - Francis - Saylor
    Hazard - Sterling - Walcott - Chadli - Wanyama
    Rooney - Benteke - Pelle

    How does this look? Ok without a rotating keeper and Saylor?

    1. RNGD Shobby
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Sounds like Hennessey will play... whether that is at CPL or WBA who knows. Solid to me.

  22. Lateriser 12
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Still settled. RMT

    Ruddy rudd
    Kos cedric huth Coates saylor
    Haz theo mane ritchie wanya
    Roo tekkers kane

    1. RNGD Shobby
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Yup

  23. It’s gonna Ben Mee
    • 10 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    352 is so tempting... Midfield of Haz, Özil, Chadli, Mane and Sterling. Gaaaah.

    1. Daniel Exeter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      It's always tempting isn't it - yet, I always find myself with 343

  24. jennmenn
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    anyone considering Nasri?

    1. Daniel Exeter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Nope

    2. Dre
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Wasn't before, but hearing that he went home sick would be the final nail in the coffin

      1. jennmenn
        • 9 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        aah. Coffin closed then

  25. abhirup780
    • 9 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    How much money did you spend in your def & gk?
    24.5 def. 9.5 gk.

    1. anakta
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      25 & 10 -- I like a 35/65 mix

    2. Daniel Exeter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      25.5 and 9

    3. RoyaleBlue
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      24 and 9

    4. RNGD Shobby
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      9.5/25

  26. FPL Rat
    • 8 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    RMT?
    ╔--------------- Chech ----------------------- ╗
    ---------- ivanovic - francis - Cedric ---------
    ------Hazard - Milner - Richie - Cazorla--
    ╚------ Kane - Rooney - Deeney----- ╝

    Schmichel - Darmian - sinclair -huth

  27. Tomas Brolin ate all Depays
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    best 8.5m GK combo ??

  28. timski8000
    • 13 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Couple of rotation queries for everyone. I haven't seen these mentioned much - apologies if I have missed the debate. Can I get any thoughts on he below rotations?

    Goalkeepers- Migs/Howard for 10 looks good value compared to previous seasons. Guaranteed home starts the season through for teams that I feel deliver at home (warning: this may not be statistically true). Not seen any discussions around this pairing but I think the home tie offers a solid options every week?

    Mid/Fowards split - I'm liking the look of Ritchie (Bou) and Sakho (Whu) as a split rotation pair playing 3-5-2 one week and 3-4-3 another, anyone think this is viable? Opening fixtures would give AVL, LEI, BOU, LEI, SUN.

    Also general consensus is that Wilson is the plum pick from Bou - any reason why Ritchie might not be the route to go down? He has most set pieces in his locker.

    1. Daniel Exeter
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 11 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Feels like a waste of 1m on GKs to be honest.

    2. Home Run Baker
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Spending far too much on rotating players IMO.

      1. timski8000
        • 13 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        Perhaps, I feel that rotation is always seem as a way to get a few cheapie a in. My only issue with this is that it almost demands that some/most weeks you will be playing a Cheapie - and they are cheap for a reason.

        I understand that Richie/Sakho means I will be benching a potential point scorer each week, but at their respective prices I think I'm happytk do this for the tougher way fixtures.

        Thanks for the reply, I will keep the price in mind.

    3. RNGD Shobby
      • 12 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      on Mignolet/Howard...
      gw3 MCI or ars
      no thanks

  29. Tomas Brolin ate all Depays
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    best 5.5m defender ??

    1. GrumblyBlowfish
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Mangala

      1. Daniel Exeter
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 11 Years
        8 years, 10 months ago

        He said best*

        1. GrumblyBlowfish
          • 10 Years
          8 years, 10 months ago

          Sorry misread. Phil Jones then.

    2. It’s gonna Ben Mee
      • 10 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Mert

    3. jennmenn
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      In the long run Clyne. Short-term Bellerin

  30. Trigg ⭐️
    • 11 Years
    8 years, 10 months ago

    Been asked to recruit some numbers for a cash league. I'm a trusted (I hope!) member of the community and would like a really elite league, rather than people who make a team in GW1 and then forget about it for 9 months.

    It is £10 in and I'd email everyone with the prize breakdown by the weekend.

    If anyone is interested, drop me a line @ johntrigg@nunwood.com Cheers all!

    1. Hooky
      • 9 Years
      8 years, 10 months ago

      Seeing your email address reminded me of this!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD-fPb87mVA