211 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Zladan
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    I see now FH29ers are now taking hits while the rest of us wildcard for optimal end of season teams.

    Interesting.

    1. gart888
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      That just seems like poor planning on their part. I was FH29 and am def not taking any hits this week. In fact, I'm rolling this week to allow for Salah for free next GW.

    2. Merlin the Wraith
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      Took my hits in weeks running up to GW29 knowing I would be FH. Was a relief to have my GW30 team waving at me after 'That' week.

    3. linkafu
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Some will get more points even with -4;-8 than some WCs until the end of the season. There is no correct play.

      WC oftenly brings some regrets too.

      1. Zladan
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Some will of course.

        But the clear best strategy now is WC 30 FH34 BB37 or if you managed save the TC then a TC36 also.

        It’s the same every year though. FH28/29 whenever it falls with few fixtures is not the play.

        1. linkafu
          • 5 Years
          9 months, 2 days ago

          I m on TC34 and BB37. Feel good with my actual team. Only looking to replace Kudus, rest of the team all good. Not sure I will get less points than WCs from now until the end.

    4. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Yeah but how many hits did deadend GW29 people take leading up to it? How many players did they field in 29? And what is the value of WC now vs WC in 35 with a BB planned in 37?

      I think you come out around even despite FH29 being a bust. If FH29 was a success, it would be quite a setback to the deadenders.

    5. TheBiffas
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      I wildcarded in 28, two nice green arrows and FH intact 🙂

  2. El Presidente
    • 5 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    Basically down to this;

    A. Dubravka + Dalot
    B. Onana + Lascelles + 0.5 itb

    1. linkafu
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      B

  3. Philosopher's Stones
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    Replace Bowen with:

    A: Salah
    B: Palmer

    Or

    C: Bowen + Saka -> Salah + Palmer (-4)

    WCing in 31/32

    1. tommo-uk-
      • 12 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      If wildcarding in 31 then C.

      If wildcarding in 32 then A (guessing its a free transfer to salah)?

      1. Philosopher's Stones
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Cheers

    2. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      C

      1. Philosopher's Stones
        • 4 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Cheers

    3. CHICKENDINNER3000
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 2 days ago

      salah for free seems like a no brainer?

      1. linkafu
        • 5 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        This

  4. tommo-uk-
    • 12 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    Who scores more this week...

    A) Foden
    B) Salah (-8)

    1. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      That's not a true comparison because of the players you'd be buying to fund Salah.

      And even then I'd back Foden.

    2. linkafu
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Salah for sure but you can’t put the -8 only on him alone.

    3. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Foden

    4. melvinmbabazi
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      a

  5. Our Tiny Windows
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 8 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    What atrocities have befallen my wildcard team I did day one this gw?

    Kelleher Dubravka
    VanDijk Udogie Gusto AitNouri Kiwior
    Salah Son Foden Palmer Saka
    Haaland Solanke Muniz

    1. linkafu
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      Kiwior the only one I don’t like here. Prefer Lascelles as cheap defender as Botman is out until December.

      I really like this WC

    2. CHICKENDINNER3000
      • 1 Year
      9 months, 2 days ago

      i like it minus Kiwior he's going to get rotated with Zinchenko, Tomiyasu and possibly Timber too. Also just know you might end up with 2 non playing keepers once Pope and Allison are back

      1. Our Tiny Windows
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        I see I see. Ok good feedback thank you.

  6. Steavn8k
    • 1 Year
    9 months, 3 days ago

    Seeing a lot of teams ditching Solanke, but Bournemouth´s program is great, and they double in 34. Am I missing something, or are people just making room in their budget for Salah?

    1. MARVELLUS
      • 15 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      I think it is more going Darwin and Isak over him, Solanke is very much on my radar and may still make my WC team. Think the memory of the missed pen is another reason.

    2. Camzy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      I have no intention of selling. But it's likely he will be on the bench starting next week until GW34 for my team.

    3. gart888
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 3 days ago

      I think the most popular front 3 right now is Haaland, Watkins, Solanke. One probably has to go to fit in Salah like you say. Selling Haaland could be suicidal, so Watkins or Solanke it is. Could see that going either way. Solanke has a double, but Watkins is having a great season.

      1. Camzy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 14 Years
        9 months, 3 days ago

        I don't think it's that close. You sell Watkins for two main reasons.

        1. He costs more so he allows you the funds you'll probably need to get Salah.
        2. He plays City and Arsenal in the next 4 and doesn't double. Fixtures strongly favor Solanke.

        Third reason that is not discussed as much, Villa have Europe and team stability could be an issue which would affect Watkins' output (don't think he gets benched for anything but he might not score as many if they play Zaniolo over Bailey...)

        1. gart888
          • 10 Years
          9 months, 3 days ago

          Oh for sure, I'm personally leaning Watkins out, but I'm just saying I can understand why people would consider him a season long keeper with the way things have gone.

          Agree with your analysis.

          1. Utopsis
            • 4 Years
            9 months, 3 days ago

            Watkins loves a goal against the big teams. Once he's sold, he'll be difficult to get back without a WC

            1. Biggsy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 10 Years
              9 months, 3 days ago

              Does he? You may have the stats to prove me wrong but I am sure there was an article here about selling or keeping him which implied he rarely shows up against bigger teams

              1. Utopsis
                • 4 Years
                9 months, 2 days ago

                Good challenge thanks! He's scored against Newcastle (twice), Chelsea and Tottenham this season, but you're right that doesn't necessarily translate into "loves a goal".

            2. Camzy
              • Fantasy Football Scout Member
              • 14 Years
              9 months, 3 days ago

              It's the opposite. He has pretty poor results against the top teams. At least this season.

              1. Utopsis
                • 4 Years
                9 months, 2 days ago

                Fair point thanks, as above

            3. x.jim.x
              • 10 Years
              9 months, 2 days ago

              8 goals vs "The Big 6" in the last 3 seasons = "loves a goal" now?

              1. Merlin the Wraith
                • 8 Years
                9 months, 2 days ago

                Keeping. If he's fit he plays - not rotated. Playing not just for Villa but a possible summer holiday in Germany. When he hauls he bonuses He'll do for me.

              2. Utopsis
                • 4 Years
                9 months, 2 days ago

                Fair point thanks, as above.

  7. linkafu
    • 5 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    Pick one to replace Kudus:

    A Kulusevski
    B Gordon
    C Luis Diaz

    1. theodosios
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Long term Gordon, short term Diaz

  8. Oliver (Know_fpl)
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 1 Year
    9 months, 3 days ago

    I was going to WC31 but for a few days now I have though my team looks good granted I dont have Saka or Haaland yet but I think I can hold of till 35 now to maximise a BB37.

    1. Zladan
      • 7 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Have you seen the difference in teams between WC30 & WC35?

      If you have FH34 it’s an absolute no brainer…

      You might be priced out of the BB37 meta before GW35 comes around - especially on the enablers.

      1. WVA
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        All the BB players you pick in 30 will be injured or dropped by the time 37 comes along

    2. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      I wouldn't make sacrifices just to hold it, but in a similar position to you, I feel like there is no point WC to switch around a few enablers in the hope they remain fit and nailed in seven weeks time. Like this article says, hold it but don't be afraid to roll it out before GW35 if it is needed.

  9. sirmorbach
    • 8 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    Really don't know what to do with this team of mine. I fear not having Salah, but Watkins has a good fixture and I'm not sure about losing him either. Can't lose Son before Luton. Losing Saka not ideal.

    But then again, it's scary not to have Salah!

    WC and BB still available, but not sure as to what would be the best strategy.

    Any overall thoughts about best way onwards here? I would very much appreciate it. Team as follows.

    Leno
    Aké, Branthwaite, Robinson
    Son, Foden, Bowen, Palmer
    Haaland, Watkins, Solanke

    Areola, Saka, Gabriel, Doughty

    1. KunDogan
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Have u considered ditching Foden?

      1. sirmorbach
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        I have! But it doesn't give me that many extra options, sadly. I do appreciate it though!

    2. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      The reality is that you can't afford to add Salah without compromise on at least one of Son, Foden, Palmer, Saka, Haaland or Watkins. Even if you had the TV, it is likely you would be compromising a lot elsewhere.

      Decided who you want from that seven + Salah and take it from there

      1. sirmorbach
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        You're right, much as it hurts. Only doubt now is whether to do it this week or the next. Might as well toss a coin

        1. Biggsy
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 10 Years
          9 months, 2 days ago

          Beauty is you have the WC so you have the chance to put right any decision you make without a point hit.

  10. focaccia
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 3 days ago

    What to do with this team? £2m itb and 1FT. Still have my FH and WC.

    Areola

    Porro / Gabriel / Doughty

    Son (C) / Foden / Palmer / Saka / Bailey

    Haaland / Watkins

    Subs: Johnstone / Toney / Taylor / Reguillon

  11. Tonyawesome69
    • 6 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Increased uncertainty for Kerkez owners

    Max Aarons back available. Marcos Senesi and Luis Sinisterra both out, Lloyd Kelly back in training with the team.

    https://twitter.com/EchoSportJack/status/1773341774171300084?t=hsCDqzlH3hDzOmpF3DDY1A&s=19

  12. sirmorbach
    • 8 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Gordon or Garnacho?

    Foden, Bowen, Solanke - Salah, Gordon, Muniz (- 8). Yes or no?

    1. Vjm6891
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Not for me but what do I know. Do you need them all in this week? I'm guessing you do to get Salah in.

      1. sirmorbach
        • 8 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Yeah, exactly!

  13. Boss Hogg
    • 15 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    What do people think of Havertz as a pick on a wildcard?
    Seems to be in good form of late, versatile in terms of position, and has started all the recent games.

    Could he be a decent alternative to Saka in order to allow investment elsewhere?

    1. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Worth a punt, sure.
      Will be a differential though, that can go either way.
      Those with both will benefit most obs

  14. FootballRookie
    • 2 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Is it really suicidal to go without Haaland?

    This is what my WC team looks like without him....

    Onana, Petrovic
    Porro, VVD, Gabriel, Burn, Gusto
    Salah, Son, Foden, Saka, Palmer
    Isak, Darwin, Solanke

    1. FootballRookie
      • 2 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Forgot to say I will be using FH in 34 and then BB later

    2. TheBiffas
      • 4 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      I'm considering it. It allows you to pick every other player you want without having to worry about funds

    3. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Deffo a risk to go without the leagues top scorer during thier teams title challenge run in.

    4. ⭐ Bemba_Da ⭐
      • 14 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Same argument most season with leaving one of the best players out of teams. If you are someone who gets worried about not owning a player which can potentially score 4-5 goals in a game then I’d say don’t

      However if you want to risk it go ahead just be aware it can go terribly wrong and season over

    5. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      It looks bad because you'll be losing points at 180% EO a lot of weeks (although realistically, GW33 aside, he won't be the standout captain choice for the next few). But if your £7.5m forwards match him, and the £6-£7m saved gains you more points that the cheap players you'd have alongside Haaland then you have more points so its better. No two ways about it.

      I feel confident in going without Haaland, but I have the WC in hand....

    6. WVA
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      You TV must be pretty poor, I can have that team with Haaland

      Onana
      Porro Gabriel Gusto
      Salah Son Foden Saka Palmer
      Haaland Darwin

  15. FPL Laurenzo
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Other than a player from Arsenal, Chelsea or Liverpool, who is the best defender to have for GW 30 who also doubles in 34?

    1. Miguel Sanchez
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Palace player

    2. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Munoz or Ait Nouri

  16. sk24
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Areola Turner
    Porro Saliba Gabriel
    Salah Saka Foden Palmer
    Haaland Watkins Solanke
    Turner, Doughty Sarabia Taylor

    1ft 1.1itb

    A) Foden, Saliba > Son, Bradley/Gusto/4.4
    B) Saliba > VVD
    C) Save

    WC 35/36, BB 37, no FH

  17. fakelund
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    On Wildcard this week. Can’t decide between these combos:
    a) VVD and Garnacho
    b) Gomez and Gordon

    1. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      How long do you intend to keep your liv defender?
      If intended to 33 with FH 34 you could probably get away with Bradley

      1. potatoace
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 13 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Otherwise...A.

      2. fakelund
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 7 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        no FH left, on A currently, but Gordon is tempting me…

        1. potatoace
          • Fantasy Football Scout Member
          • 13 Years
          9 months, 2 days ago

          Getv gordon later, closer to the double.

          1. fakelund
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 7 Years
            9 months, 2 days ago

            nice one, cheers

  18. Vjm6891
    • 4 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    If you have all chips left (a bit stupid of me really) when do you play the TC?

    Wildcard Whenever, maybe 31 or 35
    FH 34
    BB got to be 37 then

    Got to be TC 36 if there is that Spurs/Chelsea double. Or maybe just a spurs player GW38.

    Any plus in WC 33, BB34, FH37?

    1. potatoace
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Yeah, 36 seems to be your best option . Unless you play out in a blaze of glory with TC38

    2. AC/DC AFC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 9 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      You'd probably be better off with

      TC34
      BB37
      FH38

      Good luck with whatever you decide but make sure you do decide...

  19. Tonyawesome69
    • 6 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Andy Robertson’s injury is more impact rather than anything serious. Still a doubt for next games depending on how his ankle settles down but Scotsman has escaped any serious blows

    https://twitter.com/LewisSteele_/status/1773352860228419797?t=sKu7_vyIIZ9NIyHZaruvjg&s=19

    1. Merlin the Wraith
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Given doubt over who takes his position think a Robbo-VvD swap is on the cards for me.

    2. Merlin the Wraith
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Cheers for the info yet again Tony.

    3. Tonyawesome69
      • 6 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Scan results on his ankle showed no bone or ligament damage and the left-back, who limped off late in the first half at Hampden Park on Tuesday, is expected to be sidelined for days rather than weeks.

      https://theathletic.com/5372147/2024/03/28/andy-robertson-injury-liverpool/

      1. FootballRookie
        • 2 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Based on this, would you say bringing Bradley in for now is good to go?

  20. Gazwaz80
    • 5 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Hello chaps, any Fol Challenge league codes I can join, many thanks…

    1. Gazwaz80
      • 5 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      FPL

  21. MGD
    • 8 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Neto
    Doughty - Gabriel - Saliba
    Saka - Foden - Palmer - Son
    Watkins - Solanke - Haaland

    Kelleher - Estupinan - Taylor - Hee Chan

    1ft, 2.9 itb

    __
    My plan until GW 34 and WC 35:

    GW 30:
    Estupinan -> Ait Nuri (Bench Gabriel)

    GW 31:
    Son -> Salah (Enough money by 0.1)

    GW 32:
    Save FT

    GW 33:
    Watkins -> Darwin
    Save FT

    GW 34:
    Foden -> Eze
    Hee Chan -> Sarabia or something

    DGW 34 Team:
    Neto*
    Ait Nouri* - Gabriel* - Saliba*
    Saka* - Eze* - Hee Chan* - Salah*
    Darwin* - Solanke* - Haaland

    (Still have 3 ITB to spend somewhere along the way)

    Thoughts?

    1. sirmorbach
      • 8 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      Similar situation myself. I am extremely scared not to have Salah this week

  22. FootballRookie
    • 2 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Tried to do WC without Haaland on an earlier post, but too risky for sure....
    How's this WC look instead.... FH and BB still left ..

    Petrovic, Areola
    Udogie, Ait Nouri, Gabriel, Gusto, Lascelles
    Salah, Son, Saka, Foden, Palmer
    Haaland, Isak, Muniz

    1. Biggsy
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      9 months, 2 days ago

      With the other seven, why go Muniz? With BB left for 34 or 37 he doesn't have great fixtures and may not be as nailed with Jiminez coming back (don't quote me on timescales). I get he is a cheap enabler and is nice with an unexpected benching of the other seven, but is he who you want on your BB?

      Nice job fitting that front seven in though!

      1. FootballRookie
        • 2 Years
        9 months, 2 days ago

        Thanks ..

        Yeah he is a cheap enabler... Who else would you suggest as third striker?
        Anyone else would mean downgrading the likes of Foden, Saka or Son, as well the defense

        1. FootballRookie
          • 2 Years
          9 months, 2 days ago

          How is this instead ..

          Petrovic, Onana
          Udogie, Bradley (or can go Maguire), Gabriel, Gusto, Lascelles
          Salah, Son, Foden, Palmer, Rice
          Haaland, Isak, Darwin

          Saka is the sacrifice with this draft downgraded to Rice

        2. WVA
          • 8 Years
          9 months, 2 days ago

          Semenyo

  23. MHG
    • 7 Years
    9 months, 2 days ago

    Benching headache:
    A) Saka
    B) D Luiz
    C) Foden

    Thinking B ?

    1. Sarri-ball
      • 15 Years
      9 months, 1 day ago

      I'd still go B

      But If saka misses out not a bad replacement

  24. Sarri-ball
    • 15 Years
    9 months, 1 day ago

    Start Ake or Braithwaite

    Braithwaite only seems to score points when 3rd on my bench

  25. Gudjohnsen
    • 7 Years
    8 months, 12 days ago

    Anything worth a hit?

    Raya
    Gabriel, Maguire, Branthwate
    Saka (VC), Salah (C), Eze, Palmer
    Haaland, Darwin, Solanke

    Subs: Areola, Doughty, Son, Romero

    0.4 ITB

  26. Gudjohnsen
    • 7 Years
    4 months, 3 days ago

    Who should I get rid of first?

    A.Eze
    B. CHO
    c. Muniz

    1. Gudjohnsen
      • 7 Years
      3 months, 4 days ago

      C