Scout Squad

The Scout Squad: Our top picks for FPL Gameweek 29

Despite a smaller pool of players to choose from in Blank Gameweek 29, there are only seven consensus picks in this week’s Scout Squad.

Our in-house panel of Marc, Sam, Neale and Tom explain their key nominations and omissions below.

ABOUT THE SCOUT SQUAD

Scout Gameweek 28 Squad

In this article series, our team discuss who they think the best players are for the upcoming Gameweek in isolation. In other words, there’s no medium-term planning involved.

The players who get the most votes are likelier to make Friday’s Scout Picks.

Each of our writers must meet the following requirements for this feature:

  • At least one sub-£5.0m goalkeeper
  • At least one sub-£5.0m defender
  • At least one sub-£6.0m midfielder
  • At least one sub-£7.0m forward
  • No more than three players from the same club

SCOUT SQUAD: GAMEWEEK 29 PICKS



270 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Sz21
    • 13 Years
    17 hours, 37 mins ago

    1. Gvardiol in for TAA (-4)
    2. Just leave it and pray!
    3. WC this week. BB 32, FH- 33/35, TC whenever.

    Feel like my team is looking very poor this GW and at 400k- need something drastic.
    Pickford.
    Greaves, Gabriel, Myko, Robinson.
    Bowen, Mbuemo, Palmer, Nwaneri.
    Beto, Wood (c).
    Raya, Salah, TAA, Isak.
    0ft, 0.0m ITB..

    0
    1. Hazz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 7 Years
      17 hours, 31 mins ago

      I don't think Gvardiol is a 'must' but it's a low risk roll for Trent, over next two, you'd imagine?

      Don't personally feel WC worth it this week.

      +1
      1. Sz21
        • 13 Years
        17 hours, 11 mins ago

        Yes right. The -4 looks very justifiable here.

        0
    2. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      17 hours, 25 mins ago

      1

      +1
  2. Hazz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    17 hours, 35 mins ago

    Current squad:

    Pickford
    TAA* Gabriel Hall* Greaves
    Palmer Mbeumo Kluivert Dango
    Wood Cunha*
    Fabianski // Salah* Isak* Munoz*

    A) Cunha/Palmer/TAA/Hall > Haaland/Bruno/Aina/Williams [-8]

    B) Cunha/Palmer/TAA/Hall > Haaland/MGW/Aina/Gvardiol [-8]

    C) Isak/Cunha/TAA > Haaland/Wissa/Aina [-4]

    D) Cunha/TAA/Hall > [FWD]/Aina/Gvardiol [-4]

    For D the FWD can be anyone except Haaland. Also, for all, considering Dango > anyone for -4(!)

    0
    1. DavvaMC
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 4 Years
      17 hours, 31 mins ago

      B looks good.

      0
    2. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      17 hours, 26 mins ago

      D with Pedro

      0
    3. Jam0sh
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 12 Years
      16 hours, 50 mins ago

      Probably D

      0
  3. Trovsmash
    • 11 Years
    17 hours, 33 mins ago

    Hi team, after some help!

    Pickford (Vald)
    Myoloenko Gab Munoz* Trent * VDB
    Salah* Palmer Mbeumo Bowen Rogers
    Isak Cunha Pedro

    1.7itb

    A) Isak Cunha Trent > Halaand (c), Evanilson, Williams -4, 0.0ITB and have 11 if VDB is fit.

    B) Palmer Trent Cunha > Kluivert, Halaand (c), Murillo -4, .9ITB and have 10 if VDB is fit.

    Cheers!

    0
    1. Trovsmash
      • 11 Years
      17 hours, 32 mins ago

      Apologies, Rogers, Cunha & Isak should all be asterixed and not playing*

      0
    2. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      17 hours, 27 mins ago

      b

      0
    3. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 10 Years
      17 hours, 21 mins ago

      Yeah def B in that situation.

      0
  4. Bggz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 14 Years
    17 hours, 28 mins ago

    Some FH options:
    1) Pedro or Haaland?
    2) Garnacho, Bowen or Son? (playing Bruno)
    3) Gvardiol or Dalot?
    4) Raya or Pickford? (no other Arsenal or Everton def)

    0
    1. David Parkinson
      • 2 Years
      17 hours ago

      H
      S B G in that order
      G
      R

      0
    2. Bushwhacker
      • 5 Years
      15 hours, 31 mins ago

      Sels or Onana for gk

      0
  5. jimmy.floyd
    • 8 Years
    17 hours, 26 mins ago

    Is Beto penalty taker for Everton?

    0
    1. Sheffield Wednesday
      • 4 Years
      17 hours, 13 mins ago

      It appears PGMOL guidance is not to award Everton any penalties in the Premier League.

      0
      1. Sheffield Wednesday
        • 4 Years
        17 hours, 13 mins ago

        ...and then issue an apology after the fact for getting decisions wrong.

        0
  6. Buck The Trent
    • 13 Years
    17 hours, 20 mins ago

    Would you do Isak to Haaland for free before the former’s expected price drop today ?

    Will only lose 0.3 to buy Isak back

    0
    1. BUZZBOMB ♡
      • 10 Years
      17 hours, 15 mins ago

      Yes. I did. If still got WC. Depends on who he replaces if not.

      0
  7. Letsgo!
    • 8 Years
    17 hours, 10 mins ago

    Capt haaland or bruno?

    0
    1. David Parkinson
      • 2 Years
      17 hours, 2 mins ago

      The former.

      0
  8. Iceball
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    16 hours, 59 mins ago

    Will get Haaland but sell...
    A) Palmer for a hit
    B) Salah for free but lose value 0.4 or 0.5 when getting back on WC31

    0
    1. Caravagio
      • 10 Years
      16 hours, 54 mins ago

      I think Palmer out. Sh1te games for him.

      0
    2. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      16 hours, 53 mins ago

      a

      0
    3. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      16 hours, 35 mins ago

      a

      0
  9. Caravagio
    • 10 Years
    16 hours, 55 mins ago

    A) get wood and captain
    B) sell Palmer for semenyo and get haaland (c) and -4
    ?

    0
    1. Bggz
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 14 Years
      16 hours, 53 mins ago

      a

      +1
      1. Caravagio
        • 10 Years
        16 hours, 52 mins ago

        Think wood outscores haaland this week?

        0
  10. the dom 1
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 10 Years
    16 hours, 49 mins ago

    TAA > ???

    a. Aina

    b. RAN

    c. Gvardiol

    Cheers

    0
    1. Caravagio
      • 10 Years
      16 hours, 48 mins ago

      C for me. Unless no other forest defenders?

      0
      1. the dom 1
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • 10 Years
        16 hours, 42 mins ago

        No Forest defenders mate

        0
        1. Caravagio
          • 10 Years
          16 hours, 42 mins ago

          I think gvardiol still based on next week too.

          0
          1. the dom 1
            • Fantasy Football Scout Member
            • 10 Years
            16 hours, 39 mins ago

            Cheers mate

            +1
  11. Letsgo!
    • 8 Years
    16 hours, 45 mins ago

    bowen or mbeumo?

    0
    1. Caravagio
      • 10 Years
      16 hours, 42 mins ago

      Bowen

      0
    2. the dom 1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      16 hours, 42 mins ago

      Mbeumo for me

      0
  12. Tiamani Warrior
    • 11 Years
    16 hours, 44 mins ago

    Captain Wood or take a -4 to captain Haaland/Bruno? If take the hit then which?

    0
    1. Caravagio
      • 10 Years
      16 hours, 41 mins ago

      Similar dilemma.
      I think haaland when you take into account gw30...

      0
      1. Tiamani Warrior
        • 11 Years
        16 hours, 36 mins ago

        Hmm but would you captain Haaland over Salah GW30? And if not is Haaland vs Leicester that much better than Isak vs Brentford which I would be giving up...

        0
        1. Manani
          • 13 Years
          15 hours, 31 mins ago

          hmm, was pretty set on Isak > Haaland, now this makes me rethink lol

          0
  13. Letsgo!
    • 8 Years
    16 hours, 43 mins ago

    Raya RAN
    Or SA tarkowski?

    0
  14. Norco
    • 10 Years
    16 hours, 41 mins ago

    Would you pull the trigger?

    3FT:

    TAA Palmer Mateta > Gvardiol Nwaneri Haaland.

    Only thing I'm wondering best 5.0 or less mid:
    A. Nwaneri
    B. Minteh
    C. Sarabia

    0
  15. TochanMama
    • 12 Years
    16 hours, 34 mins ago

    Who would you start?
    A) Faces
    B) Harwood-Bellis

    0
    1. Norco
      • 10 Years
      16 hours, 30 mins ago

      Not feces

      0
    2. TochanMama
      • 12 Years
      16 hours, 30 mins ago

      **
      A) Faes
      B) Harwood-Bellis

      0
  16. SAUCY SALAH
    • 8 Years
    16 hours, 25 mins ago

    Ok, I NEED Bruno in my main team now

    0
    1. Sun Jihai
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 13 Years
      16 hours, 13 mins ago

      The only time he got more transfers in than this current GW was in GW12 when he scored 2 points vs. Ipswich 🙂

      +1
      1. SAUCY SALAH
        • 8 Years
        15 hours, 54 mins ago

        Well course but that could happen with any player.
        He be matching Palmer for 3m less lol

        0
  17. Hazz
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 7 Years
    16 hours, 9 mins ago

    Pickford
    TAA* Gabriel Hall* Greaves
    Palmer Mbeumo Kluivert Dango
    Wood Cunha*
    Fabianski // Salah* Isak* Munoz*

    Thoughts on this?

    A) Cunha/Palmer/TAA/Hall > Haaland/Bruno/Milenkovc/Williams [-8], then exact for Dango > Sarr (SOU) in GW30?

    B) Cunha/Palmer/TAA/Hall > Haaland/Elanga/Milenkovc/Gvardiol [-8], then for Dango > up to 7.2m... possibly still Sarr (SOU) in GW30?

    0
  18. The Polymath
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 9 Years
    16 hours, 1 min ago

    Already on a -8 getting in Haaland and Gvardiol.

    Would you risk another -4 to get in Fernandes for Bowen or Mbeumo?

    0
    1. the dom 1
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • 10 Years
      15 hours, 58 mins ago

      No

      0
    2. RICICLE
      • 2 Years
      15 hours, 42 mins ago

      No

      0
    3. ZimZalabim
      • 8 Years
      15 hours, 29 mins ago

      Nope

      0
  19. Lucas8406
    • 5 Years
    15 hours, 54 mins ago

    Pick one please
    A) Ait-Nouri, Bruno, Haaland (Trent goes)
    B) Kluivert, CHO/Elanga, Haaland
    C) Kluivert, Bruno, Evanilson

    0
    1. ZimZalabim
      • 8 Years
      15 hours, 30 mins ago

      C

      0
  20. v3n0m
    • 3 Years
    15 hours, 50 mins ago

    4 FT, 2m ITB (have Bruno and Wood)
    A) Dango + 4.4 -> Semenyo + Evanilson
    B) Dango + 4.4 + Greaves -> Elanga + N. Williams + Evanilson
    C) TAA + Palmer + 4.4 -> N. Williams + Elanga + Haaland
    D) Dango + 4.4 + Palmer + Isak -> Haaland + Elanga + Evanilson + Semenyo

    0
    1. ZimZalabim
      • 8 Years
      15 hours, 30 mins ago

      C

      0
  21. Price Changes
    rainy
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 9 Years
    15 hours, 44 mins ago

    Price changes 14th March

    Rise: Gibbs-White 6.6

    No falls

    +10
    1. Andy_Social
      • 12 Years
      15 hours, 2 mins ago

      That's a relief. I need more time to make my decisions this weekend.
      Cheers, Rainy

      0
      1. rainy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 9 Years
        12 hours, 5 mins ago

        Phew, same here.

        0
    2. Eze Really?
      • 10 Years
      13 hours, 4 mins ago

      Once again, thank you Rainy. The surge in WC's having a slight impact on price changes. Heads up to fplstatistics for having good calls this week.

      +1
      1. rainy
        • Fantasy Football Scout Member
        • Has Moderation Rights
        • 9 Years
        11 hours, 25 mins ago

        It's the Dark Arts to be sure. Got to appreciate the prediction wizards putting in the work 🙂

        +2
  22. Manani
    • 13 Years
    15 hours, 38 mins ago

    A. Isak + Palmer > Haaland + MGW
    B. TAA + Hall > Gvardiol + Kerkez

    A will mean I have to play Bednerak

    0
    1. Manani
      • 13 Years
      15 hours, 38 mins ago

      (or C. A + TAA > Gvardiol (-4)

      0
    2. ZimZalabim
      • 8 Years
      15 hours, 31 mins ago

      A

      0
  23. SpaceCadet
    • 11 Years
    15 hours, 37 mins ago

    Better option here? WC gw31.

    A. Taa Sarr > milenkovic Bruno
    B. Taa palmer isak > milenkovic Bruno Haaland -4

    pickford
    gabriel myko huijsen greaves
    palmer mbeumo kluivert
    wood wissa

    valsi salah taa isak sarr

    0
    1. ZimZalabim
      • 8 Years
      15 hours, 32 mins ago

      B

      0
  24. ZimZalabim
    • 8 Years
    15 hours, 34 mins ago

    Palmer and Watkins to Kluivert and Haaland -4
    or
    Dango and Watkins to Bruno and Evanilson -4

    0
    1. SpaceCadet
      • 11 Years
      15 hours, 30 mins ago

      B

      0
  25. white lightning
    • 11 Years
    15 hours, 21 mins ago

    Just gauging if i need to take a hit have 3 ft's which would be:
    Hall, Dango, Isak out - Milenkovic, Fernandes, Wood in

    Pickford
    Gabriel, Milenkovic, Kerkez
    Fernandes (vc), Palmer, Mbeumo, Kluivert
    Wood (c), Wissa, JP

    Fabs, Salah, TAA, Munoz
    This leaves 1m bank

    The problem is i have no way to go Wissa to Mateta/Isak with 1ft in gw30 so the hit part was downgrading Palmer to says Gibbs-White/Elanga so it gives me the cash. Lots will be taking hits so impact will not be so great. So which option do you like:
    (a) no hit or
    (b) take the hit

    Thoughts & thanks.

    0
    1. David Parkinson
      • 2 Years
      14 hours, 56 mins ago

      a, not worth a hit unless Haaland's involved.

      0
  26. Disco Stu
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • 12 Years
    15 hours, 15 mins ago

    If you were bringing in a defender for 29 and 30, would it be
    A. Ait-Nouri

    B. Gvardiol

    0
    1. David Parkinson
      • 2 Years
      14 hours, 58 mins ago

      B

      0
  27. wheredabudat
    • 10 Years
    15 hours, 12 mins ago

    Neale is the best. Thank you for the Glasner AM 20 pointer advise the week before.

    +1
  28. My name is Maradona
    • 1 Year
    15 hours, 12 mins ago

    Captain Bruno or Wood? Worth a TC?

    0
    1. Lovely ball from Silva to A…
      • 2 Years
      15 hours, 4 mins ago

      I would C Wood.. Ballsy holding the TC this long.. Mo not good enough? Anyway, since its your chip by all means play it

      0
    2. David Parkinson
      • 2 Years
      14 hours, 59 mins ago

      Wood, no.

      0
  29. Ryan
    • Fantasy Football Scout Member
    • Has Moderation Rights
    • 13 Years
    10 hours, 34 mins ago

    Can someone explain the WC logic this week? What is the appeal? How can you be certain you have the best DGW players without knowing who will get the DGW in GW33?

    0
    1. The 12th Man
      • 11 Years
      10 hours, 30 mins ago

      I expect those having to WC have 4-5 FTs available but their team is in a mess.

      Using the WC saves the use of those transfers and enables any moves needed the other side to navigate future weeks.

      That’s the situation I’d consider using it this week.

      0
    2. The Mentaculus
      • Fantasy Football Scout Member
      • Has Moderation Rights
      • 3 Years
      10 hours, 26 mins ago

      Firstly, I think WC is preferable to FH since balancing 33 with 34 is virtually impossible without FH, whereas you can WC now into a team that still halfway prepares you for 33 by going heavy on City, couple of Bournemouth, 1-2 Arsenal, maybe a Brighton attacker, and park e.g. Muñoz and Isak on the bench. Then it shouldn't be too hard to save up 3-4 FTs by GW33.

      I think it's safe enough to gamble on City & Villa getting the double, and then you just predict or hedge the other QF ties. It's a slight gamble, and maybe a bit tricky if trying to setup BB33, but doable, and I think ultimately preferable to FH29 if your team is a proper shambles for this week

      0
    3. Nightcrawler
      • 5 Years
      10 hours, 18 mins ago

      Well it varies case by case. I'm going WC this week cuz

      -i have to take a hit to field even 10 this week
      - have 3 FTs. The new rule allows me to bank those and get 3 more DGWers in the coming week
      - No BB so don't have to worry about going overboard in DGWers
      - have AM so can't use WC in 31 or 32
      -its not impossible to predict some of the DGW. Villa and city almost certainly will have one. Palace already have one and could get another. The. U have 4 weeks to react to other DGWers

      Point 3 and 4 make a WC this week very easy call for me butfor those with BB and no AM point 2 and 5 also work to an extent, especially if the team this week is really poor

      0
      1. kempc23
        • 10 Years
        10 hours, 12 mins ago

        Isnt another option to FH into the DGW33 and then manage BGW34 with free transfers instead?

        I WC’d last week, as had too many fires to fight. I gained 30 points in that week, have 11 without hits for this week. My team looks great for gw30 (probably bench boost).

        0
        1. Nightcrawler
          • 5 Years
          10 hours, 5 mins ago

          Yes that's my other option but I depends on the FA cup results

          If forest Bournemouth palace especially don't make it through I'll just use AM 30-32 and FH 33. Would also lose Haaland and get Palmer after 2 weeks using the FTs in that case

          WCing this week allows the flexibility depending on FA cup results

          0
  30. BusbySwede
    • 7 Years
    10 hours, 18 mins ago

    Okey, i think i have decided on 2 out of 3 transfers.
    Sarr & Cunha -> Bruno & Evanilson

    But have some headache on deciding on the 3rd.
    Would you do
    A) Konsa -> RAN/Forest def
    B) Isak -> Wood
    C) take a hit and do both?

    Pickford, Flekken
    Gabriel, Robinson, Huijsen, Munoz, Konsa
    Salah, Palmer, Mbuemo, Kluivert, Sarr
    Isak, Wissa, Cunha

    0